LET’S TAK ABOUT CONSPIRACY THEORIES, 6.2L PERFORMANCE THEN Q&A SESSION

Likes: 344

Views: 5760

Leave a Reply

  1. nastychevys

    We have all seen that companies pay to have "testing" done that is skewed in their favor. It happens in all walks of sales.

    Yes there are some testing guys like you that do very fair tests and put the info out there for all of us. There are others that only care about money.

  2. HioSSilver1999

    Ive seen lots of furd tards with there tinfoil hats claim the ls is a windsor copy.
    My response is if it was it would be as bigga turd as those things were.

  3. Dean Stevenson

    Six things. 1.Chevy moved uo from 9 inch deck to The 9.22 inch deck…as the Cleveland 351C and Essex 232. 2. Chev moved back to four bolt per bore head bolts, not Five. Just like Fords Cleveland. 3. Lifters moved up to 875 thou, JLF". (Just like Fords Cleveland). 4. The firing order moved to the Cleveland f/o JLF. 5. Chevy Moved back to wedge head…just like the Essex 90 232 and SVO 4.5 Cosworth~Brodix heads. 6. The port phasing is Windsor and Cleveland. Although it was Buicks Nail head and the alloy BOP 215 – Buick 300. But no conspiracy theory. Just co-incidence fellas. Ford guys get butt hurt when GM Powertrain make as much power as a quad cam Mod or Cleveland with less features.

  4. Dean Stevenson

    I feel there is anti Mopar Small Block Conspiracy. The 360 with modified EngineQuest iron heads can flow 295 cfm. Suerly there is Ford Cleveland and LS power for a 6 liter combination with similar to FoMoCo and GM Powertrain head flow. The Wedge LA is not being focused on. Just my opinion. And the Cleveland 366 NASCAR tri power gave the 340 Six Pack its carbs. I really would like to see the 340 Six beat the Boss 351s 383 hp rating on the dyno. Can anyone see why the Mopar Small block 1966 to 1990 has been consipred against…the Magnum and Hemi are different and improved, but Mopar probably could have done More with Less like the LS. Thoughts?

  5. Danny Wilsher

    When in doubt, lean it out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. Danny Wilsher

    Would, could anyone tell me the pros and cons of a destroked 400 small block Chevy compared to a stroked 350. I built a 377 destroked 400 long time ago and it was one of the best running engines I have ever built. I never built a stroked 350… Thus my question and desire to know pros and cons of both….. Thanks!!!!!

  7. PS A

    The big problem seem to be that the marketing department is in control of a lot of stuff, and I guess the people that asks for all the wrong stuff and give them ideas. People that buy cams based on how loopy the idle is should be forced to run with blown head gaskets, if you ask me.

  8. Andre Mauboussin

    Hi Richard. Thanks again for all you do. Looking for a turbo magnum v8 build and also a turbo 383 mopar (the factory big bore stroker and chrysler built 3M of them!). Learning lots about boost😄

  9. Jacob Strutner

    So many ads I can't even watch this.

Comments are closed.